Legal Opinion

Grand Rapids & Indiana Railroad v. McAnnally

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 12, 1884No. 11,719PublishedCited by 26 opinions

From the Randolph Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHowk, J.

In this case the appellee sued the appellant in a complaint of two paragraphs. In the first paragraph, appellee alleged that appellant was indebted to him in the sum of $2,348.40, for work and labor done and performed by him for the appellant, at its instance and request, in inspecting, repairing and flagging its night trains, at Ridgeville Crossing, from December 6th, 1876, to May 13th, 1881, from six o’clock p. M. to six o’clock A. m. ; and that such sum was due and wholly unpaid. In the second paragraph of complaint, appellant’s indebtedness to appellee was alleged to be $2,-396.25, for…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Comer v. HimesIndiana Supreme Court · 1875
  2. Byram v. GalbraithIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  3. North-Western Mutual Fire Insurance v. BlankenshipIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Indianapolis & Vincennes R. R. v. McCaffreyIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
  5. Keesling v. RyanIndiana Supreme Court · 1882

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. LightheiserIndiana Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Chicago, St. Louis & Pittsburgh Railroad v. SpilkerIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. CrunkIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Baltimore & Ohio & Chicago Railroad v. RowanIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  5. McCoy v. Kokomo Railway & Light Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1902

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API