Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Houtz

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 28, 2004PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY GANTMAN, J.:

¶ 1 Appellant, Melanie Houtz, asks us to determine whether the trial court erred when it compelled her to proceed to trial without counsel and without first conducting a proper colloquy on the record pursuant to Pa.R.Crim.P. 121 to ensure her knowing, voluntary and intelligent waiver of counsel. We hold Appellant did not knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently waive her right to counsel, under prevailing Pennsylvania law. Accordingly, we vacate Appellant’s judgment of sentence, and remand the matter for a new trial.

¶2 The relevant facts and procedural history of this…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. StarrSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  2. Commonwealth v. PaysonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  3. Commonwealth v. MonicaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  4. Commonwealth v. McDonoughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  5. Commonwealth v. BrazilSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. PattersonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  2. Commonwealth v. PhillipsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  3. Commonwealth v. HeilmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  4. Commonwealth v. JohnsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  5. Commonwealth v. FloydSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API