Short v. City of Cornelia
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Lilly, Judge.
The court properly sustained the general demurrer and dismissed the petition seeking an injunction. The second ground of the demurrer asserted that the petition “shows on its face that the plaintiff has an adequate and complete remedy at law.” Under the allegations of the petition as to the character of business being conducted by him, and as to the occupation license tax therefor required by ordinance, mandamus was an available legal remedy, whereby the plaintiff would be entitled, on proof of such allegations, to mandamus requiring the defendant city to issue a license…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Cutsinger v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1914
- Coker v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
- Cathcart Van & Storage Co. v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1930
- Peginis v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
- Howard v. Briarcliff Zoological Corp.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1934
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- City of Cumming v. FlowersSupreme Court of Georgia · 2017
- CITY OF CUMMING v. FLOWERSSupreme Court of Georgia · 2017