Legal Opinion
Reich v. Local 890, International Brotherhood of Teamsters
District Court, N.D. California
Decided June 25, 1996No. C-95-20384-EAIPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER DISMISSING PETITIONER’S COMPLAINT
INFANTE, United States Magistrate Judge.*
J. INTRODUCTION
The Secretary of Labor initiated this suit pursuant to Title IV of the Labor-Management Reporting and Disclosure Act, 29 U.S.C. § 401 et seq. (hereinafter the “Act” or “LMRDA”) against defendant Local 890, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, AFL-CIO (“Local 890” or “Union”), alleging that the Union violated section 401(g) of the Act by utilizing an employee payroll deduction system for campaign contributions. The Secretary moves for summary judgment, re*440questing that the court…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Wirtz v. Glass Bottle BlowersSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Hodgson v. Local Union 6799, United SteelworkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Wirtz v. Local Union No. 125Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Janet Ritza, and Eddie Duenez v. International Longshoremen's and Warehousemen's UnionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Dorris v. Danone Waters of AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2024