Legal Opinion
Janet Ritza, and Eddie Duenez v. International Longshoremen's and Warehousemen's Union
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 11, 1988No. 86-6273PublishedCited by 72 opinions
1Per curiam
Applicants for registration as Class “B” longshoreman seek damages and an injunction based on a claim that the process by which registrants are selected is tainted by nepotism and a failure to adhere to contractual procedures. The district court found that the applicants had not exhausted grievance procedures required by the collective bargaining agreement and that their failure to do so was not excused. The applicants appeal the dismissal of their action for failure to exhaust contractual remedies.
BACKGROUND
Appellants are “casual” longshoremen whose applications for registration as Class “B”…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. Winston Bryant McConneyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Mortensen v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
- Republic Steel Corp. v. MaddoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Glover v. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by72 opinions
- Juan Albino v. Lee BacaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Wyatt v. TerhuneCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Bryant v. RichCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008
- Payne Ex Rel. D.P. v. Peninsula School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Richard Baker, Cross-Appellee v. Farmers Electric Cooperative, Inc. And Lawson WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.