Legal Opinion
Mohr v. Kelley
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided February 17, 2000No. 98CA1271PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge ROY.
In this action arising out of an employment wage dispute, plaintiffs, Jannine Mohr and Charlotte McDaniel, appeal a partial summary judgment entered in favor of defendant, Guy Kelley. We affirm.
McDaniel and Mohr were initially volunteers with defendant's campaign committee for election to the United States House of Representatives from the Fourth Congressional District in the 1996 general election (the Campaign). In their amended complaint, the plaintiffs allege they were each hired by the Campaign: McDaniel in January of 1996, and Mohr, as Campaign chairman, in March of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Aspen Wilderness Workshop, Inc. v. Colorado Water Conservation BoardSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
- Kaiser Foundation Health Plan of Colorado v. SharpSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
- COUNTY COURT IN & FOR CTY. OF EL PASO v. RuthSupreme Court of Colorado · 1977
- State v. BachmanHawaii Supreme Court · 1979
- Thomas v. DunneSupreme Court of Colorado · 1955
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Timm v. ReitzColorado Court of Appeals · 2001
- MT Falkin Investments, L.L.C. v. Chisholm Trail Elks Lodge No. 2659, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2013
- Wisehart v. MeganckColorado Court of Appeals · 2002
- of Colorado v. 5 Star FeedlotColorado Court of Appeals · 2019