Bandy-Freeman v. Newton ,et al.
District Court, N.D. Alabama
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION VERONICA BANDY-FREEMAN, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2:22-cv-01148-NAD ) WAYMAN A. NEWTON, ) ) Defendant. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT For the reasons stated below, and on the record in the oral argument motion hearing, the court GRANTS the motion for summary judgment filed by Defendant Wayman A. Newton (Doc. 54). On Plaintiff Veronica Bandy-Freeman’s two constitutional claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, Defendant Newton is entitled to qualified immunity. Plaintiff…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.