Legal Opinion

Bandy-Freeman v. Newton ,et al.

District Court, N.D. Alabama

Decided September 24, 2025No. 2:22-cv-01148Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION VERONICA BANDY-FREEMAN, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2:22-cv-01148-NAD ) WAYMAN A. NEWTON, ) ) Defendant. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT For the reasons stated below, and on the record in the oral argument motion hearing, the court GRANTS the motion for summary judgment filed by Defendant Wayman A. Newton (Doc. 54). On Plaintiff Veronica Bandy-Freeman’s two constitutional claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, Defendant Newton is entitled to qualified immunity. Plaintiff…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API