Legal Opinion

Regents of University of California v. New Mexico Water Quality Control Commission

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided April 28, 2004No. 23,498PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CASTILLO, J.

{1} This case requires us to determine whether the New Mexico Water Quality Control Commission (Commission) appropriately adopted a sentence in the water quality standards amended in May 2002. The sentence, contained in 20.6.4.10.G NMAC (2002), reads as follows: “The human health standards for persistent toxic pollutants, as identified in Subsection M of Section 20.6.4.900 NMAC, shall also apply to all tributaries of waters with a designated, existing or attainable fishery use.” Subsection M sets forth numeric criteria for persistent toxic pollutants. The Regents of the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Sims v. SimsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Key v. Chrysler Motors Corp.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1996
  3. High Ridge Hinkle Joint Venture v. City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Wolfley v. Real Estate CommissionNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Bokum Resources Corp. v. New Mexico Water Quality Control CommissionNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1979

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. NMAC New Mexico Mining Ass'n v. New Mexico Water Quality Control CommissionNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2006
  2. Phelps Dodge Tyrone, Inc. v. New Mexico Water Quality Control CommissionNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2006
  3. Pickett Ranch, LLC v. CurryNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2006
  4. New Mexico Mining Ass'n v. Water Quality Control CommissionNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2007
  5. Albuquerque Cab Co. v. N.M. Pub. Regulation Comm'nNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2017

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API