Legal Opinion
Murr v. Marshall
District Court, C.D. California
Decided November 25, 2009No. EDCV 04-1380-TJH (MAN)PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
TERRY J. HATTER, JR., District Judge.
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition for Writ of Ha beas Corpus, all of the records herein, the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge, Respondent’s Objections (“Objections”), and Petitioner’s Response to Respondent’s Objections. The Court has conducted a de novo review of those matters to which objections have been made.
Respondent argues that, to the extent the Magistrate Judge’s conclusion that the Governor’s…
2Cases cited58 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Estelle v. McGuireSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Lockyer v. AndradeSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Superintendent, Mass. Correctional Institution at Walpole v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- MEDWAY v. CateDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2010