Legal Opinion
Nunan v. Timberlake
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided June 29, 1936No. 6524PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STEPHENS, Associate Justice.
This is an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia entered upon a verdict in favor of the appellee. The suit was in tort for negligence.
The facts are as follows: In the early hours of February 11, 1934, the appellee, B. Elizabeth Timberlake, plaintiff below, was riding to her residence in Washington, D. C., in the automobile of the appellant, J. Raymond Nunan, defendant below. On the way, the car ran into the beacon light and concrete abutment of a street car safety zone on Connecticut Avenue, and the appellee was injured. She…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- West v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Carangelo v. Nutmeg Farm, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
- Summers v. TarneyIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
- Pistorio v. Washington Railway & Electric Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1917
- Western Gas Const. Co. v. DannerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1899
3Cited by15 opinions
- Eureka Investment Corporation, N v. V. Chicago Title Insurance Company, Chicago Title Insurance Company v. Eureka Investment Corporation, N v. Eureka Investment Corporation, N v. V. Chicago Title Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
- Johnson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1972
- Wright v. Capital Transit Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1943
- Cohen v. Evening Star Newspaper Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1940
- McCartney v. HolmquistDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1939
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.