Summers v. Tarney
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Noble Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtBerkshire, J.
The complaint is in two paragraphs. In the first paragraph it is stated that the appellee, who was the plaintiff below, was the owner of a horse of the value of $200, and that the appellant, who was the defendant below, “ unlawfully injured, wounded, maimed and crippled said horse, to the damage,” etc.
The second paragraph contains the same prefatory allegations as the first, and alleges that the appellant “ unlaw*561fully injured, wounded, maimed and crippled said horse by violently and with great force breaking the leg of said horse; and said plaintiff further says that believing that said wound…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Pennsylvania Co. v. MarionIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- City of Indianapolis v. GastonIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
- Pittsburgh, Cincinnati & St. Louis Railway Co. v. HixonIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
- Cincinnati, Indianapolis, St. Louis & Chicago Railway Co. v. GainesIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Johnston Harvester Co. v. BartleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Brosnan v. SweetserIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
- Carangelo v. Nutmeg Farm, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
- Hormann v. HartmetzIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
- KAMPO TRANSIT, INC. v. PowersIndiana Court of Appeals · 1965
- Sibbing v. CaveIndiana Supreme Court · 2010
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.