Legal Opinion

Phœnix Lumber Co. v. Regents of University of Idaho

District Court, D. Idaho

Decided September 8, 1908PublishedCited by 3 opinions

At Law. Action by the Phoenix Lumber Company against the Regents of the University of Idaho. Ón demurrer'to the complaint.

1Opinion of the Court

DIETRICH, District Judge.

[1] Upon the ground that the complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, the demurrer must be sustained. The plaintiff sues as the assignee of James A. Colson & Son, and, apart from the formal allegations of corporate existence and of jurisdictional facts, the charge is:

“That on or about March 30, 1907, the defendant was indebted, to James A. Colson & Son * * * in the sum of three thousand dollars ($3,000.00), which sum was then and thére due and payable from said defendant to said James A. Colson & Son.”

Assignment, demand for payment,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. US Bank v. PLANTERS'BANKSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
  2. American Bonding Co. v. Regents of UniversityIdaho Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Swanholm v. ReeserIdaho Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Board of Trustees v. BrunerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1896

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Interstate Const. Co. v. Regents of University of IdahoDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 1912
  2. Rorick v. Board of Com'rs of Everglades Drainage Dist.District Court, N.D. Florida · 1928
  3. Mazur v. HymasDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API