Legal Opinion
Rorick v. Board of Com'rs of Everglades Drainage Dist.
District Court, N.D. Florida
Decided July 7, 1928No. 160PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CLAYTON, District Judge.
There are pending before the court two bills by the plaintiffs, one seeking specific performance to compel the delivery of bonds under alleged contract by and between the plaintiffs and the defendants, the board of commissioners of Everglades drainage district. Hearing on motion to dismiss such bill has not been had-
In the other, ease No. 160, now under consideration by the court, plaintiffs, as owners of certain of the bonds already issued and outstanding, pray injunction to prevent the averred impairment of their claimed contract uncjer the bonds issued by the.…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Pennsylvania v. West VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Gunter v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Hopkins v. Clemson Agricultural College of South CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Board of Liquidation v. McCombSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Lewis v. PetersSupreme Court of Florida · 1953
- FRANKLIN TP. IN SOMERSET COUNTY, NJ v. TugwellCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1936
- FRANKLIN TP. IN SOMERSET COUNTY, NJ v. TugwellCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1936
- Rorick v. Board of Com'rs of Everglades Drainage Dist.District Court, N.D. Florida · 1932