Consolidated Plaster Co. v. Wild
Supreme Court of Colorado
Error to the District Court of Larimer Cownty. Eon. Clvristian A. Bennett, Judge. Action by Tbe Consolidated Plaster Company against Alfred Wild. Prom a judgment for defendant, plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
Mr. .Justice Goddaed
delivered tbe opinion of tbe court:
Tbe plaintiff in error, Tbe Consolidated Plaster Company, a corporation, instituted this action against Alfred Wild, tbe defendant in error, to establish its ownership of, and its right to tbe exclusive possession and enjoyment of, a certain leasehold estate and interest in certain described real estate, and in and to a *203certain gypsum mill, known and designated in the record as the New Buckhorn Mill, under and by virtue of the terms of a written and oral lease. Upon the conclusion of plaintiff’s testimony the trial court, upon defendant’s…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Stock-Growers' Bank v. NewtonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1889
- Phelan v. KelleyNew York Supreme Court · 1841
- Seymour v. Slide & Spur Gold MinesSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Brown v. WilsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1895
- Hoffman v. ReichertIllinois Supreme Court · 1893
3Cited by5 opinions
- Munson v. MarksSupreme Court of Colorado · 1912
- Buckhorn Plaster Co. v. Consolidated Plaster Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1910
- Foster v. CoffeySupreme Court of Colorado · 1922
- Wannamaker v. PendletonColorado Court of Appeals · 1912
- Wannamaker v. PendletonColorado Court of Appeals · 1912