Legal Opinion

Mulbah v. Jansen

District Court, D. South Dakota

Decided March 18, 2022No. 4:20-cv-04127Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA SOUTHERN DIVISION SHECK MULBAH, 4:20-CV-04127-KES Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING IN PART AND vs. GRANTING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT CODY JANSEN, in his individual AND DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION capacity, FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT Defendant. Plaintiff, Sheck Mulbah, brought suit against defendant, Cody Jansen, alleging various violations of his civil rights under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Docket 1. Specifically, Mulbah alleges, under the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments, that Jansen (1) unlawfully seized him by stopping his…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  5. Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API