Legal Opinion

Murray v. Associated Insurers, Inc.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided May 3, 1994No. 9310IC5PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*513EAGLES, Judge.

Plaintiffs appeal from the Industrial Commission’s opinion and award filed 11 August 1992. Defendants also cross assign error to support the Industrial Commission’s opinion and award. After careful review of the briefs, transcripts and record, we reverse and remand to the Full Commission for findings of fact on the question of whether decedent had a concurrent business purpose for travelling to Hound Ears on 27 June 1987.

I

Plaintiffs contend that the Commission erred in finding that “even if [decedent] had business to conduct on June 28, 1986, he was off duty and not about that…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Claim of Dependents of Marks v. GrayNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
  2. Vause v. Vause Farm Equipment Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  3. Allred v. Allred-Gardner, IncorporatedSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  4. Robbins v. NicholsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  5. Roberts v. Burlington Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1988

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Mills v. City of New BernCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
  2. Nunn v. Texaco Trading & Transportation, Inc.Nebraska Court of Appeals · 1994
  3. Crane v. Berry's Clean-Up & Landscaping, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
  4. Cauble v. Soft-Play Inc.North Carolina Industrial Commission · 1995
  5. Guy v. National Health LaboratoriesNorth Carolina Industrial Commission · 1995

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API