Tillotson & Wolcott Co. v. Scottdale MacHine & Mfg. Co.
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtSullivan, J.
The issue in this cause is not as complicated or as intricate as the voluminous briefs and elaborate arguments would imply. However, both have shed light oil the questions involved, and have been drawn upon in all their detail to shed light upon the examinations of the errors assigned, which are that the court below misinterpreted the language of what is known and designated throughout the pleadings and the record as a guaranty, as distinguished from the obligations of a principal or a surety to a certain instrument of writing, which must be analyzed and interpreted in the light which it…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Federal Life Insurance v. LillibridgeIndiana Court of Appeals · 1912
- Warner Gear Co. v. BergdollSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
- De Luka v. . GoodwinNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
- McAfee v. WyckoffNew York Supreme Court · 1904
- Acme Brick Co. v. WestCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Meeker R&D, Inc. v. Evenflo Co., IncOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
- Avco Corp. v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1975
- First National Bank of Cincinnati v. HeineHamilton County Municipal Court · 1988
- Cleveland Window Glass & Door Co. v. National Surety Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1927
- G. & R. Mortgage & Investment Co. v. LevineOhio Court of Appeals · 1929
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.