Legal Opinion

G. & R. Mortgage & Investment Co. v. Levine

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided May 27, 1929No. 9840Published

1Opinion of the CourtSullivan, J.

We are inclined to support, after an examination of the two cases, the contention of defendant below.

It will be seen from a reading of the order and acceptance in the case at bar that the acceptance is conditional and of course without the acceptance the instrument is worthless as a binding obligation and for the same reason it is just as lifeless in its legal character if the conditions attached to the acceptance are of such a nature that the acceptance is inoperative excepting upon the fulfillment of the impositions and burdens of the conditions attached thereto. This order and acceptance…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Tillotson & Wolcott Co. v. Scottdale MacHine & Mfg. Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API