Legal Opinion

United States v. Walter Scot Boigegrain

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided September 8, 1997No. 96-1548PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Per curiam

Walter Boigegrain appeals an order of the district court entered pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 4241(d) committing him to the custody of the Attorney General for a period not to exceed four months to determine whether competency to stand trial is likely to be attained. The issue is whether we have jurisdiction over the appeal. We note that most of the other circuits which have considered this matter have concluded that there is jurisdiction over such orders and, accordingly, order en banc consideration to reassess our holding to the contrary in United States v. Cheama, 730 F.2d 1383 (10th Cir.1984).

B…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Coopers & Lybrand v. LivesaySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Abney v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Stack v. BoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1952

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. United States v. Walter Scot BoigegrainCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
  2. United States v. Donald FriedmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  3. United States v. Priscilla J. DetersCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
  4. United States v. Louie A. Ferro, Sr.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003
  5. United States v. Martinez-HaroCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API