Legal Opinion

United States v. Walter Scot Boigegrain

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided August 21, 1998No. 96-1548PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TACHA, Circuit Judge.

This appeal invites us to resolve two constitutional questions regarding the relationship between an attorney and a potentially incompetent client in a criminal case. First, we must determine whether a client who may be incompetent to stand trial has a constitutional right to waive his counsel before a hearing on his competency. The second issue presented is whether counsel who moves for an evaluation of the defendant’s competency against the defendant’s wishes thereby render-s ineffective assistance of counsel. Exercising jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, we…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Dusky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. Luther K. Barnett, Jr. v. Steve HargettCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
  2. Grant v. RoyalCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2018
  3. Turner, Albert JamesCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2013
  4. People v. LightseyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Bryson v. WardCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API