United States v. Walter Scot Boigegrain
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
TACHA, Circuit Judge.
This appeal invites us to resolve two constitutional questions regarding the relationship between an attorney and a potentially incompetent client in a criminal case. First, we must determine whether a client who may be incompetent to stand trial has a constitutional right to waive his counsel before a hearing on his competency. The second issue presented is whether counsel who moves for an evaluation of the defendant’s competency against the defendant’s wishes thereby render-s ineffective assistance of counsel. Exercising jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, we…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Dusky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- Luther K. Barnett, Jr. v. Steve HargettCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
- Grant v. RoyalCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2018
- Turner, Albert JamesCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2013
- People v. LightseyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
- Bryson v. WardCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.