Legal Opinion

New York Life Insurance v. Glens Falls Insurance

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 18, 1945PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShientag, J.

This motion presents, for the first time, the question of the applicability of the 80% coinsurance clause, of a policy of fire insurance, to small losses. The issue arises on a motion made by the plaintiff to strike out the defendant’s partial defense, pleading that the amount of the loss sustained was reduced by virtue of the failure of plaintiff to carry insurance in the amount of 80% of the sound value of the property.

The clause under consideration reads as follows: “ New York Standard Average Clause. This company shall not be liable for a greater proportion of any loss or damage to the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Aldrich v. Great American InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921
  2. Pinsky v. FireAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1929

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Magie v. Preferred Mutual InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  2. Quaker Hills, LLC v. Pacific Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
  3. Merritt v. Jefferson InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1982
  4. NICASTRO, RYAN v. NEW YORK CENTRAL MUTUAL FIRE INSURAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
  5. New York Career Institute v. Hanover InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 2005

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API