Legal Opinion

Merritt v. Jefferson Insurance

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 7, 1982PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Joseph J. Sedita, J.

This is a motion for summary judgment. Plaintiffs seek payment in full by the defendant insurance companies for a loss from a fire on their property. The amount of the damages is not in dispute. The only dispute is over whether or not the “coinsurance” clauses of the insurance policies limit the companies’ liability to something less than the full amount of the damages under the facts of this case.

Three insurance companies are involved here. Two companies provide primary coverage and the third company provides “excess” coverage. The concept of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. GEN. ACC. FIRE & LIFE ASSUR. CORP. v. PiazzaNew York Court of Appeals · 1958
  2. New York Life Insurance v. Glens Falls InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1945

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Quaker Hills, LLC v. Pacific Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
  2. St. Paul Mercury Insurance v. Lexington InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API