Legal Opinion
Pinsky v. Fire
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 1, 1929PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMerrell, J.
This controversy arises through a fire loss sustained by plaintiff’s assignor, Solomon Raisin, and involves the pro rata *327liability of the defendant under the terms of a policy of fire insurance issued by defendant upon a stock of merchandise and fixtures owned by the insured. It is stipulated in the agreed statement of facts that Solomon Raisin, plaintiff’s assignor, owned a stock of merchandise and fixtures located at 862A Tremont avenue, borough of The Bronx, New York city, and that on the 1st day of May, 1923, the defendant, a foreign corporation incorporated under the laws of the State of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Schmaelzle v. London & Lancashire Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1903
- Page v. Sun Insurance OfficeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1896
- Sherman v. Madison Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1875
3Cited by3 opinions
- American Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co. v. Lumber Mutual Casualty InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937
- New York Life Insurance v. Glens Falls InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1945
- New York Life Insurance v. Glens Falls InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1949