Legal Opinion

Hawkins v. County of Marin

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 21, 1976No. Civ. 37352PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

EMERSON, J. *

This is an appeal from an order granting summary judgment in favor of defendants and interveners (respondents), which order further provided that plaintiffs’ (appellants’) complaint for declaratory relief, injunction and petition for writ of mandamus should be dismissed with prejudice.

Appellants are home owners in the Laurel Grove Canyon section of Kentfield, an unincorporated area in Marin County. Within the Canyon is a parcel of property, consisting of some 4.8 acres, known as the “Priory.” That property, which is owned by respondent the Province of the Holy.Name,…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Millbrae Assn. for Residential Survival v. City of MillbraeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  2. Johnston v. City of ClaremontCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Wheeler v. GreggCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  4. Essick v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Ferdig v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Travis v. County of Santa CruzCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Neighborhood Action Group v. County of CalaverasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  3. J. L. Thomas, Inc. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
  4. Elysian Heights Residents Ass'n v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  5. United Outdoor Advertising Co. v. Business, Transportation & Housing AgencyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API