Legal Opinion

Boland v. Gillett

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1878PublishedCited by 4 opinions

APPEAL from the Circuit Court for Racine County. The case is sufficiently stated in the opinion. The plaintiff appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtTaylob, J.

This is an ordinary action of ejectment. The record-shows that the case has been twice tried in the court helow. On the first trial a jury was waived, and the court found in favor of the plaintiff*, and judgment was entered in his favor.

The defendant, within one year after the entry of judgment, paid up the costs, and a new trial was granted on his application, under the provisions of sec. 20, ch. 141, R. S. 1858, as amended. On the second trial, which was a jury trial, a verdict was rendered in favor of the defendant, and judgment was entered thereon in his favor. Thereupon, and within one…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ogden v. GliddenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1859
  2. Bellinger v. MartindaleNew York Supreme Court · 1853
  3. Cunningham v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1860
  4. People ex rel. Gilman v. Judge of Wayne Circuit CourtMichigan Supreme Court · 1870
  5. Wright v. MilbankThe Superior Court of New York City · 1863

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Boyle v. Northwestern Mutual Relief Ass'nWisconsin Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Smith v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Newland v. MorrisWisconsin Supreme Court · 1902
  4. State ex rel. Banks v. McClureWisconsin Supreme Court · 1895

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API