Cunningham v. City of Milwaukee
Wisconsin Supreme Court
APPEAL from tbe Circuit Court for Milwaultee County. Tbe opinion of tbis court states as nrucb of tbe case as is necessary for a full understanding of tbe decision.
Read the full summary
APPEAL from tbe Circuit Court for Milwaultee County. Tbe opinion of tbis court states as nrucb of tbe case as is necessary for a full understanding of tbe decision. Tbe circuit court gave judgment for tbe plaintiff, Cunningham. contended, among other things, that tbe plaintiff could not discontinue bis suit in tbe district court, after taking a new trial under sec. 33, chap. 106, R. S. 1849, (sec. 20, chap. 141, 1858) and then commence another action in another court, citing Fraser vs. Weller, 6 McLean, 11. contended that tbe record of tbe district court in tbe case of Cunningham vs. The City…
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court,
Dixon, C. J.
Tbis is an action of ejectment, commenced by tbe respondent, Cunningham, in tbe circuit court of Milwaukee county, to recover possession of a certain piece of land, situated within tbe city of Milwaukee, and occupied by it as a public highway. In addition to tbe general denial, tbe answer sets forth two special matters of defense, one of which is, that tbe respondent heretofore instituted an action of ejectment against tbe appellant, for tbe same premises, in tbe district court of tbe United States for tbe district of Wisconsin, in which a trial upon tbe merits *121was…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Fraser v. WellerU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Michigan · 1853
3Cited by7 opinions
- Green Bay & Mississippi Canal Co. v. HewittWisconsin Supreme Court · 1885
- State ex rel. Burlington & Missouri River Railroad v. ScottNebraska Supreme Court · 1888
- Hyatt v. ChallissSupreme Court of Kansas · 1898
- Deming v. DouglassSupreme Court of Kansas · 1899
- Boland v. GillettWisconsin Supreme Court · 1878
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.