Wright v. Milbank
The Superior Court of New York City
This was a motion for a new trial, in an action in the nature of ejectment. The facts are fully stated in the opinion of the Court.
1Opinion of the CourtRobertson, J.
This is an action to recover possession of certain lands in the City of Hew York. It has been *673twice tried, once Tby the Court without a Jury, and once by a Jury; in both cases the issues were found for the plaintiffs. After the first trial, a second one was obtained, under the statute, on payment of costs, without reference to the merits. A third trial is now asked for, upon the ground of a different result in an action broug’ht for an adjoining piece of land, tried since the issues in this.
The subject of controversy seems to have formed part of a larger piece of land, laid down on maps in…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Bellinger v. MartindaleNew York Supreme Court · 1853
3Cited by3 opinions
- Boland v. GillettWisconsin Supreme Court · 1878
- Keeler v. DennisNew York Supreme Court · 1886
- Phyfe v. MastersonThe Superior Court of New York City · 1879