Legal Opinion

Pollman v. Swan

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided December 29, 2011No. A10A0547, A10A0548PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, Presiding Judge.

In Pollman v. Swan, 289 Ga. 767 (716 SE2d 191) (2011), the Georgia Supreme Court affirmed Division 1 and reversed a portion of Division 3 of this court’s opinion in Pollman v. Swan, 305 Ga. App. 369 (699 SE2d 582) (2010). The Supreme Court held that reliance is not an element of mail fraud, reversed the judgment of this court with respect to that holding, and remanded the case to this court for further proceedings not inconsistent with its opinion. On remand, we affirm the trial court’s grant of summary judgment on that claim. We do so because the trial court correctly…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Holmes v. Securities Investor Protection CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Bridge v. Phoenix Bond & Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
  3. Anza v. Ideal Steel Supply Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
  4. Maddox v. Southern Engineering Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
  5. Markowitz v. WielandCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Jane McGinnis v. American Home Mortgage Servicing, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2016
  2. Renton v. WatsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2013
  3. Mark Vernon v. Assurance Forensic Accounting, LLCCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2015
  4. Copeland v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
  5. Elmore Copeland v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2012

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API