Legal Opinion

In re the Acquisition of Lands for the Purpose of a Municipal Garage in & for the City of Utica

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 15, 1931PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

While the resolution of the common council was not artistically drawn, its meaning was clear and included authority to the legal officer of the city to make the application for abandonment under section 18 of the Condemnation. Law. Application under that section should ordinarily be granted. (N. Y., O. & W. Ry. Co. v. Nelson, 152 App. Div. 245.) We find in the record before us no sufficient reason to warrant, in the discretion of the court, a denial of the application. All concur, except Thompson and Crosby, JJ., who dissent and vote for affirmance on the grounds: 1. That the resolution or…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re the Acquisition of Lands for the Purpose of a Municipal GarageNew York Supreme Court · 1930
  2. New York, Ontario & Western Railway Co. v. NelsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re Municipal Housing Authority of SchenectadyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954
  2. Municipal Housing Authority of Utica v. Ruffini, New York County Courts1964
  3. Municipal Housing Authority v. RuffiniAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API