Legal Opinion

In re Municipal Housing Authority of Schenectady

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 19, 1954PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCoon, J.

This is a condemnation proceeding. Only two properties are involved on this appeal, one parcel owned by respondent Bose Levine and another owned by respondent Mary Gallo. We will take up the third appeal first, because in view of the conclusion we have reached on that appeal, the others become academic.

As a part of a slum clearance program plaintiff-appellant has acquired by purchase all of the property in a certain area designated for clearance except the two parcels here involved. In March, 1952, condemnation proceedings were started to acquire these two parcels, and commissioners of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re the Acquisition of Lands for the Purpose of a Municipal GarageNew York Supreme Court · 1930
  2. New York, Ontario & Western Railway Co. v. NelsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912
  3. In re the Acquisition of Lands for the Purpose of a Municipal Garage in & for the City of UticaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1931

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Consolidated Gas Supply Corp. v. ReillyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
  2. Municipal Housing Authority of Utica v. Ruffini, New York County Courts1964
  3. Amusements, Inc. v. AssaroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1971
  4. Municipal Housing Authority v. RuffiniAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API