O'quin v. Charles Stores
District Court, M.D. North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
HAYES, District Judge.
This is a motion for a new trial under Rule 59 and for judgment in its favor notwithstanding the verdict under Rule 50 (b), Federal Rulés of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. After notice, a hearing on the motion was held, arguments were heard and written briefs were filed.
The plaintiff L. R. O’Quin sued the defendant for $15,000.00 actual damages and $15,000.00 punitive damages growing out of an alleged malicious prosecution. The *241case was tried before a jury which found that the defendant procured the institution of a criminal prosecution against the plaintiff in the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Kelly v. Newark Shoe Stores Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
- Long v. Eagle 5, 10 & 25c Store Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
- Kelly v. . Traction Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
- Kelly v. Durham Traction Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
- Lamm Ex Rel. Lamm v. Charles Stores Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.