Legal Opinion
People v. Bradford
New York Court of Appeals
Decided October 19, 2010No. 159PublishedCited by 60 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Graffeo, J.
This appeal requires us to consider whether there is record support for the Appellate Division’s conclusion that the exclusionary rule does not require the suppression of defendant’s confession. Because there is a basis in the record for the Appellate Division’s determination that the confession was sufficiently attenuated from defendant’s initial detention by the police, we affirm.
In November 2003, defendant began a relationship with a young woman he met on a telephone “chat line.” He was a 37-year-old registered sex offender; she was a 16 year old who had been…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Brown v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- People v. BoodleNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- People v. PaulmanNew York Court of Appeals · 2005
- People v. RogersNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- People v. ConyersNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by60 opinions
- The People v. Genna A. TurnerNew York Court of Appeals · 2014
- People v. BoykinsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- People v. TateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- People v. JonesNew York Court of Appeals · 2013
- People v. Guevara-CarreroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.