Legal Opinion

Daniel v. Donohue

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 14, 1959PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Connell, J.

In this suit we are called upon to construe the will of Mary C. Yogt. More specifically we are asked to decide which of the blood relations of the testatrix and her mother are to be included within a class designated by the testatrix as the “blood relations of my deceased mother and myself.” The same will was before this court for construction in Heilig v. Daniel et al., 203 Or 123, 275 P2d 854, 278 P2d 988 (1955). In that case the court expressly reserved the specific problem of construction which is raised in the present appeal.

Mary C. Vogt died on July 17, 1935, leaving a will which she…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. St. Louis Union Trust Co. v. KaltenbachSupreme Court of Missouri · 1945
  2. In Re Carter's WillSupreme Court of Vermont · 1926
  3. Gerrish v. HinmanOregon Supreme Court · 1880
  4. Heilig v. DANIELOregon Supreme Court · 1955
  5. In Re Estate of MillerOregon Supreme Court · 1926

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Pedro v. JanuaryOregon Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Wells Fargo Bank v. Title Insurance & Trust Co.California Court of Appeal · 1971
  3. Henderson v. State Tax CommissionOregon Tax Court · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API