Legal Opinion

ESPOSITO

Board of Immigration Appeals

Decided July 1, 1995No. ID 3243PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Interim Decision #3243 Interim Decision #3243 In re Antonio ESPOSITO, Respondent File A30 619 479 - New York Decided March 30, 1995 U.S. Department of Justice Executive Office for Immigration Review Board of Immigration Appeals (1) For purposes of section 212(a)(10) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1182(a)(10) (1988), and its successor provision at section 212(a)(2)(B) of the Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1182(a)(2)(B) (Supp. V 1993), a sentence is “actually imposed” where a criminal court suspends the execution of a sentence, but no sentence is “actually imposed” where the imposition of…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Ernest Francis v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
  2. SILVABoard of Immigration Appeals · 1976
  3. Antonio Esposito v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
  4. Melesio Manuel Tapia-Acuna v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
  5. Alexander Komarenko v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. ROLDANBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1999
  2. BLAKEBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2005
  3. Lovan v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
  4. BATISTABoard of Immigration Appeals · 1997
  5. JIMENEZBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1996

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API