Legal Opinion

Hollinger v. Kumalae

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided December 10, 1920No. 1271; No. 1272PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Reserved Questions erom Circuit Judge First Circuit. Hon. C. S. Franklin, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

KEMP, J.

Proceedings in quo warranto were instituted in the circuit court by Ben Hollinger to oust the respondents Jonah Kumalae and Manuel C. Pacheco from the office of supervisor of the City and County of Honolulu. Separate proceedings were instituted against each respondent but since the title of each is challenged upon the same grounds both causes were considered together in the circuit court and have by stipulation of parties with the approval of this court been briefed and argued together in this court and will be disposed of in one opinion. So much of the agreed…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Nicholl v. KosterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Waldo v. WallaceIndiana Supreme Court · 1859
  3. Lessee of Levy v. McCarteeSupreme Court of the United States · 1832
  4. Attorney General ex rel. Moreland v. Common CouncilMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
  5. State ex rel. Attorney-General v. BurnsSupreme Court of Florida · 1896

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. VillezaHawaii Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Dejetley v. Kaho'ohalahalaHawaii Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Hawaii Consolidated Railway, Ltd. v. BorthwickHawaii Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Re Taxes, Haw'n Pineapple Co., Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Re Taxes, Haw'n Pineapple Co., Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API