Legal Opinion

United States v. Soto-Diarte

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided November 24, 2010No. 10-3195UnpublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

STEPHEN H. ANDERSON, Circuit Judge.

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist in the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

Defendant and appellant Eduardo Soto-Diarte appeals the partial denial of a motion he made under Fed.R.Crim.P. 41(g) for the return of fifteen firearms, which he claims were seized from him prior to his incarceration. We affirm the district court’s partial…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. Rodriguez-AguirreCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
  2. United States v. Granger HowellCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
  3. United States v. CopemanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. ConeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API