Legal Opinion
Negrete v. Citibank, N.A.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided February 27, 2017No. 15 Civ. 7250PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Sweet, District Judge.
Defendant Citibank, N.A. (“Citi” or “Defendant”) has moved pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 8(a), 9(b) and 12(b)(6) to dismiss the amended complaint (the “First Amended Complaint” or “FAC”) filed by Eduardo Negrete and Gervasio Negrete (the “Negretes” or “Plaintiffs”). The Plaintiffs have cross-moved pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56 for partial summary judgment for breach of contract. Upon the facts and conclusions set forth below, the motion of Citi to dismiss is granted in part and denied in part, and the cross-motion of the Negretes,…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Arista Records, LLC v. Doe 3Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
- Lama Holding Co. v. Smith Barney Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1996
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Sec. Investor Prot. Corp. v. Bernard L. Madoff Inv. Sec. LLCUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2018
- 25th Street Group Apartments 1, LLC v. Bremer Bank, National AssociationDistrict Court, D. North Dakota · 2022
- Esper Kallas v. The G & P Agency, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2024
- GEM Yield Bahamas Limited v. Mullen Technologies, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2024
- Garrity v. Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2023
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.