Legal Opinion

City of Sioux Falls v. Naused

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 3, 1974No. 11245PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BIEGELMEIER, Chief Justice.

On the original submission of this appeal, majority and dissenting opinions were written which indicate the facts and differing viewpoints. The opinions are reported in 88 S.D. 14, 214 N.W.2d 74, where the majority directed the dismissal of the Sioux Brake appeal. A petition for rehearing was granted.

*304With additional facts hereafter added, an outline of the position and interests of the parties to the properties involved in this condemnation proceeding was set forth in Justice Doyle’s opinion as follows:

“This appeal is from a judgment in a condemnation proceeding.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. Platte Valley Public Power & Irrigation DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Bales v. Wichita Midland Valley RailroadSupreme Court of Kansas · 1914
  3. NJ Highway Authority v. J. & F. HOLDING CO.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
  4. City of Chicago v. ShayneAppellate Court of Illinois · 1964
  5. City of Ashland v. KittleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1961

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. South Carolina Department of Transportation v. M & T Enterprises of Mt. Pleasant, LLC.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2008
  2. LaMar Advertising of South Dakota, Inc. v. Heavy Constructors, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Northwestern Nat. Bank of Sioux Falls v. BrandonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1974
  4. City of Sioux Falls v. NausedSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1974
  5. South Carolina Department of Transportation v. M & T Enterprises of Mt. Pleasant, LLC.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API