Legal Opinion

City of Sioux Falls v. Naused

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 3, 1974No. 11245Published

1Opinion of the Court

218 N.W.2d 536 (1974)

CITY OF SIOUX FALLS, a municipal corporation under the Laws of the State of South Dakota, Plaintiff,

v.

Walter H. NAUSED and Marianne D. Naused, Defendants and Respondents,

Sturdevant's L & L Motor Supply, Inc., Defendant, and

Sioux Brake and Equipment Company, Inc., Defendant and Appellant.

No. 11245.

Supreme Court of South Dakota.

Argued March 5, 1974.

Decided June 3, 1974.

Willy, Pruitt, Matthews & Jorgensen, Roy E. Willy and Gene E. Pruitt, Sioux Falls, for defendants and respondents.

Blaine Simons, Sioux Falls, for defendant and appellant.

BIEGELMEIER, Chief Justice.

On the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. Platte Valley Public Power & Irrigation DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Bales v. Wichita Midland Valley RailroadSupreme Court of Kansas · 1914
  3. NJ Highway Authority v. J. & F. HOLDING CO.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
  4. City of Chicago v. ShayneAppellate Court of Illinois · 1964
  5. City of Ashland v. KittleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1961

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API