Legal Opinion
Commonwealth v. Willstein
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Decided September 30, 1941No. Appeal, 104PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Heller, P. J.,
The appellant Mary Willstein, also known as Mary Orzechowska, was indicted under section 884 of the Penal Code (Act of June 24, 1939, P. L. 872) for the fraudulent conversion of a judgment note for $200 and $1,600 in money. She was found guilty, and was ordered released (on payment of costs) on probation for a period of two years, during which time sentence was suspended. See Com. ex rel. Paige v. Smith, Warden, 130 Pa. Superior Ct. 536, 543, 198 A. 812.
Section 834 of the Penal Code is a re-enactment of the Act of May 18, 1917, P. L. 241, with practically no change…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Gianni v. Russell Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
- Speier v. MichelsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
- Com. Ex Rel. Paige v. Smith, WardenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
- Estate of SmithPennsylvania Orphans' Court, Philadelphia County · 1891
- Bank of Hooversville v. SagersonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Pearl Assurance Co. v. National Insurance Agency, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
- Commonwealth v. SchusterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
- Commonwealth v. NeumanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
- Commonwealth v. DensonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
- Dickens v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1965
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.