Legal Opinion
Ruddell v. Fhalor
Indiana Supreme Court
Decided November 15, 1880No. 7384PublishedCited by 11 opinions
From the Wells Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtHowk, J.
— This was a suit’ by the appellant against the appellees, upon a promissory note, of which the following is a copy :
“$500.00. Lancaster Tp;, Wells Co., Ind.,
“February 1st, 1872.
“Six months after date (or before, if made out of the sale •of Drake’s Horse Hay-Fork and Hay-Carrier), we promise -to pay to James B. Drake, or order, five hundred dollars, payable at the First National Bank of Indianapolis, value Deceived, with use, without any relief from valuation or appraisement laws; if suit shall be instituted to enforce the payment thereof, I agree to pay a reasonable attorney’s fee. (Signed)…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Nebeker v. CutsingerIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
- McCoy v. LockwoodIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
- Cornell v. NebekerIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
- Maxwell v. MorehartIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
- Marshall v. DrescherIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Green v. WilkieSupreme Court of Iowa · 1896
- Woollen v. WhitacreIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
- First National Bank of Parkersburg v. JohnsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1883
- Scotten v. RandolphIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
- Webb v. CorbinIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.