Legal Opinion

Webb v. Corbin

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1881No. 8456PublishedCited by 14 opinions

From the Montgomery Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtWoods, J.

The appellant, as endorsee before maturity, sued the appellee, as maker, of a promissory note made negotiable by the law merchant.

The appellee filed an answér in two paragraphs, which the court held good upon demurrer for want of facts. The second paragraph, however, was withdrawn from the consideration of the jury by the charge of the court, leaving for our consideration the first only. Its averments are substantially as follows :

That, near the date of the note sued on, two strangers came to the house of the defendant, pretending to be agents for the “Western Medical Works,” of Indianapolis,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Nebeker v. CutsingerIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  2. Cline v. GuthrieIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  3. Kimble v. ChristieIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
  4. Cornell v. NebekerIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  5. Woollen v. WhitacreIndiana Supreme Court · 1880

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Ray v. BakerIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Green v. WilkieSupreme Court of Iowa · 1896
  3. Mitchell v. TomlinsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  4. Brickley v. EdwardsIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Baldwin v. FaganIndiana Supreme Court · 1882

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API