Legal Opinion
Scrima v. Goodley
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided October 30, 1986No. 85CA0223PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PIERCE, Judge.
Jerome Goodley and Terrance Fitzpatrick (defendants), appeal the trial court judgment entered after the court imposed a sanction for their failure to appear for scheduled depositions. We affirm.
Defendants and Frederick Mientka entered into a lease agreement which contained a specific renewal provision. The lease was eventually assigned to plaintiffs. Plaintiffs filed a declaratory judgment action under C.R.C.P. 57, seeking an interpretation of the renewal provision.
In April 1984, a date to take depositions was scheduled for late May. Two days prior to the scheduled date,…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Pepcol Manufacturing Co. v. Denver Union Corp.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1984
- Union Rural Electric Ass'n v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1983
- Concerning the Application for Water Rights of the Town of Estes Park v. Northern Colorado Water Conservancy DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1984
- Petrini v. SidwellColorado Court of Appeals · 1976
- AAA Crane Service, Inc. v. Omnibank University Hills, N.A.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1986
3Cited by4 opinions
- Nagy v. District Court of the City & County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
- Friedman v. Colorado National Bank of DenverColorado Court of Appeals · 1992
- Venta, Inc. v. Frontier Oil and Refining Co.District Court, D. Colorado · 1993
- Scrima v. GoodleyColorado Court of Appeals · 1986