Legal Opinion

Bemis v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided January 16, 1928No. E-432PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtGraham, Judge

This is a suit for the recovery.of income and excess-profits taxes claimed to have been illegally exacted. The defendant counterclaims for a sum in excess of the amount assessed and collected.

The principles applicable to this case have been passed upon in Edwards v. Douglas; 269 U. S. 204; Mason v. Routzahn, decided by the Supreme Court on November 21, 1927, 275 U. S. 175; and in the Horst cases, decided to-day by this court. Ante, pp. 433, 449.

The court said in the Mason case :

“ The Government admits that no profits were earned in 1917 prior to the payment of the dividends here in question,”…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Edwards v. DouglasSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. Mason v. RoutzahnSupreme Court of the United States · 1927

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Poste v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API