Legal Opinion
Asoma Corp. v. M/V SEADANIEL
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 18, 1997No. 96 CIV 2390 (SS)PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
SOTOMAYOR, District Judge.
Defendant, Canadian Forest Navigation Co. (“Canadian Forest”), moves this Court to dismiss or stay the proceeding commenced by ASOMA Corporation (“ASOMA”) pending arbitration in London. Co-defendant, Fortune Sea Transport Co. (“Fortune Sea”), similarly requests a stay of this action pending arbitration. For the reasons discussed below, I deny both the motion to dismiss and the motion to stay the proceeding pending arbitration.
FACTUAL BACKGROUND
On March 17, 1995, Metall Und Tohstoff A.G. (“M.U.R.”) on behalf of plaintiff, ASO-MA Corporation, entered…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Thomson-Csf, S.A. v. American Arbitration Association, Evans & Sutherland Computer CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- Seiden Associates, Inc. v. Anc Holdings, Inc., American National Can Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
- Maryland Casualty Company v. Realty Advisory Board on Labor Relations, Gus Bevona, President, Local 32b-32j, Service Employees International UnionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Apache Bohai Corp. LDC v. Texaco China BVCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007
- MAN Ferrostaal, Inc. v. M/V AkiliCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012