Payday Today, Inc. v. McCullough
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RILEY, Judge.
STATEMENT OF THE CASR 1
Appellant-Plaintiff, Payday Today, Inc. (Payday), appeals the trial court's denial of their claim for treble damages against Ap-pellees-Defendants, Henry McCullough (Henry) and Princess McCullough (Princess), (collectively, the McCullough's). We affirm in part and reverse in part.
ISSUE
Payday raises three issues on appeal, one of which we find dispositive and restate as follows: Whether the trial court erred in denying Payday's claim for treble damages.
Additionally, we also raise the following issue sua sponte: Whether the trial court erred in…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- AutoXchange. Com, Inc. v. Dreyer and Reinbold, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2004
- Clifft v. Indiana Department of State RevenueIndiana Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. RansIndiana Court of Appeals · 2000
- Clark v. CroweIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002
- Marriage of Goossens v. GoossensIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Klinker v. First Merchants Bank, N.A.Indiana Supreme Court · 2012
- Cash in a Flash, Inc. v. McCulloughIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006
- PAYDAY TODAY, INC. v. HamiltonIndiana Court of Appeals · 2009
- Weida v. City of West LafayetteIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008
- Heidbreder, Inc. v. Board of Zoning AppealsIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.