Legal Opinion

Payday Today, Inc. v. McCullough

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided February 6, 2006No. 71A03-0507-CV-310PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RILEY, Judge.

STATEMENT OF THE CASR 1

Appellant-Plaintiff, Payday Today, Inc. (Payday), appeals the trial court's denial of their claim for treble damages against Ap-pellees-Defendants, Henry McCullough (Henry) and Princess McCullough (Princess), (collectively, the McCullough's). We affirm in part and reverse in part.

ISSUE

Payday raises three issues on appeal, one of which we find dispositive and restate as follows: Whether the trial court erred in denying Payday's claim for treble damages.

Additionally, we also raise the following issue sua sponte: Whether the trial court erred in…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. AutoXchange. Com, Inc. v. Dreyer and Reinbold, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2004
  2. Clifft v. Indiana Department of State RevenueIndiana Supreme Court · 1995
  3. State v. RansIndiana Court of Appeals · 2000
  4. Clark v. CroweIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002
  5. Marriage of Goossens v. GoossensIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Klinker v. First Merchants Bank, N.A.Indiana Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Cash in a Flash, Inc. v. McCulloughIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006
  3. PAYDAY TODAY, INC. v. HamiltonIndiana Court of Appeals · 2009
  4. Weida v. City of West LafayetteIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008
  5. Heidbreder, Inc. v. Board of Zoning AppealsIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API