Legal Opinion

Hertz Drivurself Stations, Inc. v. City of Louisville

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided June 4, 1943PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Sims

Affirming.

These three appeals have been heard together and all of them will be disposed of in this opinion. Each appellant, Hertz Drivurself Stations, Dixie Driv-It-Yourself System, and the U-Drive-It Company of Ohio, as plaintiff below, brought a suit to enjoin the City of Louisville from collecting from it an annual license operating tax laid by city ordinance on trucks used on its streets. The three actions were heard together by the chancellor who refused the injunction, upheld the ordinance, dismissed the petitions and plaintiffs appeal from his judgments.

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Cum. Telep. & Teleg. Co. v. HopkinsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1906
  2. Gray v. Methodist Episcopal Church, South, Widows & Orphans HomeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1938
  3. Armstrong v. Denver Saunders System Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1928
  4. State v. DabneySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1928
  5. City of Newport v. FitzerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1909

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. George v. ScentCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1961
  2. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1946
  3. Charlotte Coca-Cola Bottling Co. v. ShawSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  4. George Wiedemann Brewing Co. v. City of NewportCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1959
  5. Rogers v. City of LouisvilleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1943

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API