Gregory v. Transamerica Insurance
Michigan Supreme Court
1DissentCavanagh, J.
The majority holds that a no-fault insurer’s liability for personal protection insurance benefits should be offset by the amount of workers’ compensation benefits the injured employee would have received if he had not entered into a redemption agreement. The majority reaches this conclusion on the basis of cases which we believe are factually distinguishable. We *637would hold that where there is a legitimate dispute between an injured employee and a workers’ compensation carrier, and the parties in good faith enter into a redemption agreement, only the amount of workers’ compensation benefits…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Mathis v. Interstate Motor Freight SystemMichigan Supreme Court · 1980
- Perez v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1984
- Jarosz v. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance ExchangeMichigan Supreme Court · 1984
- Davis v. Auto-Owners InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
- Thacker v. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance ExchangeMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.