Legal Opinion
Farrar v. Direct Commerce, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 23, 2017No. A146944PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BANKE, J.
—Plaintiff Wilson Farrar has sued her former employer, defendant Direct Commerce, Inc., alleging causes of action for breach of contract, conversion, wrongful termination, breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing, and failure to pay wages owed and waiting time penalties. Farrar, who was hired by the company as its vice-president of business development, negotiated an employment agreement set forth in a six-page offer letter detailing, inter alia, her compensation, additional bonus structure, and stock options. The agreement also included an arbitration provision,…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Armendariz v. Found. Health Psychcare Servs., Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
- Iskanian v. CLS Transportation Los Angeles, LLCCalifornia Supreme Court · 2014
- Ora Lee Williams v. Walker-Thomas Furniture Company, William Thorne v. Walker-Thomas Furniture CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1965
- Pinnacle Museum Tower Ass'n v. Pinnacle Market Development (US), LLCCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
- Sanchez v. Valencia Holding Co.California Supreme Court · 2015
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Oto, L. L.C. v. KhoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2019
- Ramos v. Superior Court of San Francisco Cnty., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Jose Ronderos v. Usf Reddaway, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024
- Chun Ping Turng v. Guaranteed Rate, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2019
- Oto, L. L.C. v. Kho, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.