Legal Opinion

Hollis v. Bender

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided January 20, 1948No. 4 Div. 27PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In aid of pending suit by Leo Bender against H.F. York, a garnishment was issued to E.H. Hollis. On the trial of the cause below, a judgment was rendered against the defendant and also against the garnishee. Only the latter brings this appeal.

The defendant, York, entered into an oral agreement with the garnishee, Hollis, by the terms of which the latter was to furnisn eighty-five hogs which the former would take and pasture on his ungathered peanut crop. Mr. York was to look after the hogs, water them, and give them such attention as their needs required. It was agreed further that the hogs…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Henry v. Murphy & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1875
  2. Thompson v. MawhinneySupreme Court of Alabama · 1850
  3. Warner v. WarnerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1946
  4. Archer v. People's Savings BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1889
  5. Dewrell v. KearleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1947

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Boykin v. LawSupreme Court of Alabama · 2006
  2. Olson v. Field Enterprises Educational CorporationCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1970
  3. White v. Stephens (In Re Stephens)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Alabama · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API